Archive for the ‘Publishing Answers’ Category

Guest Post: There’s More To Book Layout Than Meets the Untrained Eye

Monday, February 1st, 2010

By Michele DeFilippo, owner
1106 Design
www.1106design.com

Michele is a frequent contributor to many of the publishing lists and email groups, so, when I knew it was time to discuss design, I asked her to pitch in. Thank you, Michele!

We’ve heard the question many times, “Should I layout the interior of my book myself?” Seems like a no-brainer. You have word processing software. You know how to set margins and choose a typeface. You even know about books that describe the process (written by folks who are not trained in typography by the way). So why shouldn’t you layout your own book?

Of course you can and should use your word processing software to write your text, but interior design and formatting are best left to people who do this for a living. Why? Because there are a lot more details involved in page composition than you’d think.

For starters, word-processing software does not have the sophisticated hyphenation and justification controls that professional page layout software does. This results in tight and loose lines that are unsightly and that distract the reader. And even if you were to buy page layout software, there is a very steep learning curve. It’s a mistake to assume that no knowledge of typography or design is required to use it effectively. As the saying goes, “Owning a hammer does not make one a carpenter.”

There are several dozen conventions to be followed in book design that may not be perceptible to the reader, but when followed, they give your book a polished appearance. But it’s not only about knowing the rules, it’s knowing how and when to bend or break them on a case-by-case basis that makes the difference between an amateur layout and a professional one. These decisions must be made quite often when the words in the text don’t cooperate with the page geometry.

Quality typesetting has never been about the tools. Experienced typesetters rarely use software at the default settings. We adjust the settings for better results, sometimes paragraph by paragraph, line by line, and even word by word. Why? We were trained to see the difference between “so-so” type and great type.

For what it’s worth, only beginning self-publishers consider using a word processor for page layout. Established publishers wouldn’t think of producing the text in this way. They know that experienced book designers bring real value to the table, offering creativity and aesthetic judgment that only comes with training and experience.
When we show customers the difference between their attempt at book layout and our own, they are usually blown away. They’ll say something like, “Wow! I thought my layout was just fine. Now I see how bad it really is!”
Here’s a current before-and-after example. IC_Book_Orig.pdf is the client’s attempt at book layout, and IC_Book_Designed.pdf is our design. (You may want to open or print both PDFs to compare the pages side by side.) See the difference? In addition to a much better look and the elimination of giant spaces between words in the original, professional typesetting saved 5 pages from the original’s 19 (more than 25%), thus reducing the client’s printing costs significantly.

It’s been clinically proven that quality typography improves reading comprehension. More importantly, an amateur job won’t satisfy the distributors, reviewers, and book retailers, the “gatekeepers” of the book industry, who will immediately spot a beginner’s efforts and reject your book as “self-published.”

Many people think that converting a word-processed file to a PDF is all the printer needs. That’s true. But it’s not all that YOU need. Printers won’t turn away a PDF that was made from a word-processed document. They’ll print your book because that’s what they’re in business to do. Their success is measured in how many books they print. Your success, on the other hand, is measured in the number of books you sell.

Your book design, inside and out, establishes your credibility in the eyes of the buyer. Buyers may not be able to pinpoint exactly what is wrong, but without a professional interior design, your book will not measure up to those that are professionally prepared. For the success of your new publishing endeavor, we hope you’ll give this issue some serious thought, and choose an experienced book designer to give your book the professional look it deserves.

The Profitable Publisher — A new E-Book Series

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Hello all,

I have finally (!!) released the first ebook in my new series. Yes, the series name is The Profitable Publisher. This first entry is subtitled: Making the Right Decisions. It’s short (maybe 40 pages, if you printed it out), so it shouldn’t give your brain indigestion.

I’d like to think that it should help any publisher make more money from all of your books. If you are moved to purchase it (from Amazon, or elsewhere as it comes out in other markets), do please let me know what you think?

My First Ebook is Launching

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

If you’re a frequent visitor here, you might want to keep an eye out: I’m teetering on the edge of releasing my first ebook in a series. None of them will be long: this one’s about 33 pages of text and 13 pages of spreadsheets and charts illustrating the techniques.

I’ve found that this is about the length at which the eyes roll back in the head and the brain shuts down, so why go longer??

I hope that any of you who grab a copy will like it. I’d love to hear what you think. (And if you email me with an error or confusion, I’ll send you a free copy of the next work in the series!)

Ebooks: What We Lose With Them

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

Ebooks are wonderful things. I love them. I read on my Kindle, and on my Kindle app on the iPhone, and wouldn’t give them up for worlds.

With ebooks, we gain convenience and the ability to change font sizes. We gain on price and on environmental impact. We gain a number of obvious things. But we lose, as well, and some of the losses are less obvious.

We’re losing privacy, and we’re losing control of our books. We’re losing readability (both in terms of text design and in image resolution). And we’re losing barriers to entry, which is a two-edged sword.

Privacy: Some ebook readers already “phone home” and report what you’ve read and how far you’ve gotten in it. It’s not hard to imagine that this information could be used in many ways. Even if you’re reading on a device or an app that doesn’t seem to do this, it’s not hard to imagine hackers or security agencies that could install backdoors in your software that would allow them to monitor your activity. Paper books never do that. And it’s almost impossible to track your purchases at random stores, especially if you use cash.

Control: With a print-on-paper book, it’s very hard to take or damage your copy. With ebooks, someone else can take your copy without any physical contact with it. Amazon has already proven that they can pull your books back off the Kindle. Other ebook providers may or may not have the same capability.

Digital Rights Management techniques (DRM) also cuts into your control. It’s quite difficult to craft DRM that doesn’t prevent you from doing things that are within your rights, as well as those that aren’t. Certain types of copying are allowed, even by the most draconian interpretations of copyright.

Readability: Text design is an art that’s generally under-appreciated. But it doesn’t take long with a badly designed book before you realize that something feels wrong. It’s just harder to read, and often harder to understand. It’s not comfortable on the eyes. Something feels “off.”

But being able to change font sizes within a fixed screen size means that you text design and composition go out the window. Of course, the e-readers could come with a hyphenation and justification program, such as the modules that underpin TeX or InDesign, which would help enormously, but they don’t now, and they probably won’t in any near future. Who wants to wait for the text to be re-flowed when you change the font size? Who wants to pay more for the program or for the cpu size needed to run it?

Screen resolution on the Kindle is roughly twice what the resolution is on a computer screen, but it’s still only 1/2 to 1/4 what a printed book offers. And it’s black on gray only. The color screens of iPhones and laptops offer the lower dots per inch to offset their colors. It’s not as easy on the eyes.

Lower Barriers to Entry: The last loss I listed is the lowering of barriers to entry. This means that we gain ease of publishing. But as readers it means that we have a harder time finding the books we’ll enjoy. And as publishers it means we have a far harder time rising above the roar of the crowd to draw our readers’ attention. And that means that more new readers will experience fewer wonderful books in the short time during which they decide whether they “like books” or not. And that’s the worst loss to our literary community.

As usual, I invite you to tell me what I missed or messed up. The comments section doesn’t require registration, although it is moderated to reduce the flood of spammers.

Guest Post: Pete Masterson on CreateSpace Vs. LSI

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Pete Masterson is a very generous man who shares his experience as a printer and a designer with many new publishers. He participates on many listservs, including the Yahoo Group Self-Publishing. It was on that group that the following piece first appeared. He has graciously given me his permission to quote it in its entirety:

Using the CreateSpace Publishing Plan Calculator that you can download from the CreateSpace web site (this is an Excel spreadsheet with macros). These prices are all based on a color cover and a black interior book.

A softcover book of 212 pages, 6 x 9 with a list price of $16.00:
CS standard plan, sold via estore you receive a net $7.06
CS standard plan, sold via Amazon you receive a net $3.86
CS ProPlan, sold via estore, you receive a net $9.41
CS ProPlan, sold via Amazon, you receive a net $6.21
Purchased direct from CS in small quantities for delivery to the publisher,
standard plan, you pay $5.74 per copy (plus shipping)
ProPlan, you pay $3.39 per copy (plus shipping)
Larger quantities may have a discount, but I did not see one show up
in the calculator up to 250 copies.

The CS ProPlan has a $39 start up charge per title. A $5 per year per
title fee is charged to maintain the listing.

———————————————
Using Lightning Source figures as comparison:
the same book with $16.00 list price:
With a 20% wholesale discount, you receive $9.14 per copy sold via LSI/
Ingram
With a 40% wholesale discount, you receive $5.94 per copy
With a 55% wholesale discount, you receive $3.54 per copy
The print cost per copy (in all cases) is $3.66 per copy
There is a start up cost of $75. A $12 per year per title fee is
charged to maintain the listing.

If you purchase copies direct from LSI for shipment to the publisher
this book would cost $4.08 per copy plus shipping.
This charge also applies to shipments made direct to customer at order
of publisher. (This charge is based on .015 per page instead of .013
per page for the interior. Cover charge is unchanged.)

orders of
50-99 units receive a discount of 5% (reduces unit cost to $3.88)
100-249 units receive a discount of 10% (reduces unit cost to $3.67)
250 – 499 units receive a discount of 20% (reduces unit cost to $3.26)
Over 500 units receive a discount of 25% (reduces unit cost to $3.06)
(plus shipping).

======
Analysis:

So, the CreateSpace ProPlan offers a slightly lower unit cost for
books shipped directly to the publisher — but does not seem to offer
any discounts for quantity purchases. (Per page rate is .012 for the
CS pro plan and .013 at LSI — the ‘cover’ charge is .85 for CS Pro
plan vs .90 at LSI — and this is the price difference.)

LSI gives greater flexibility in setting wholesale discount rates and
terms. Using LSI/Ingram distribution, the book is available to all
booksellers where CS is only available to Amazon. Using the CS
‘estore’ would allow a slightly better return on direct to buyer
orders from your web site.

In the end, the deciding factor is if the 20% discount through LSI is
more appropriate for your business plan or if limiting sales to Amazon
(and the CS ‘estore’) is suitable.

===============================================
Pete Masterson, Author of
Book Design and Production: A Guide for Authors and Publishers
Aeonix1@Mac.com
Aeonix Publishing Group http://www.aeonix.com
===============================================

Should You Sell Directly to Readers?

Friday, October 9th, 2009

The proverb among micro- and self-publishers is that “bookstores are lousy places to sell books.” (I believe Dan Poynter was one of the first to say it.)

This can, of course, be true. You have to offer significant discounts not only to the store, but also to the wholesalers, and a distributor, too.

It seems so obvious, especially given changes to the music industry, that we should try to reach our readers directly, and also try to sell them something over and above our words. (“What?” is a question for another post.)

Direct sales are the right idea for many small presses. They’re the wrong one for many others. Whether it turns out to be right or wrong, there are a number of problems, though, when you try to execute a strategy like this.

Readers don’t trust sites they don’t know. And why should they? You’ll have much better luck getting them to buy from known sites, like Amazon, or from a bricks and mortar store.

Fish where the fish aren’t. In other words, your book needs to be where people are looking for books, or at least for information about your topic, or for entertainment, or whatever. It’s much, much harder to bring people to you to buy a book than it is to put your book where people interested in your topic are already congregating and purchasing things.

Overhead and transaction costs are real, and significant, even if they’re hard to see. And they can kill your business even if you never understand how.

You may think you have no overhead or transaction costs because you’re operating out of an unused bedroom, and doing everything yourself. But even if you’re not writing someone else a check to do the necessary work, you’re still paying for it. How? Well, surely there’s something you could do with that time that would enrich your life more than packing your 597th box? That’s not going to market your books. It’s not helping you find more manuscripts (or write them yourself, whichever). And it’s certainly not a life experience you really need. (Well, not unless you have a whole lot of guilt to assuage.)

Do NOT neglect opportunity costs. Like most of the rest of the “real” world, they can hurt you whether you believe in them or not.

That’ll do for a start on a list of “gotchas” that must be dealt with. What others have bothered you? And what do you like about reaching out directly to your readers?

A Google Settlement I Could Support

Monday, September 28th, 2009

So, the original Google Settlement is dead, dead (spell that D-O-J: dead). As frequent readers of this blog may remember, I wasn’t too enthused about it, and I won’t be grieving.

I do, however, hope that some version does come to fruition. I think it has the potential to make enormous sums for most small and micro-presses, and to keep authors’ work alive for a far longer time.

It might even help reverse the steady decline in book reading that has afflicted this country.

What would I like to see in that agreement?

1. Compensation for the infringements to date going not to rightsholders, but to the formation of the rights registry. The proposed compensation in the old agreement was so small per title as to be utterly useless, but in the aggregate, it could move many mountains. That registry could benefit all of us in much larger ways, and forcing Google to pay for it will ensure that no other corporate behemoth gets the idea that they can infringe with impunity.

Part of the cost of establishing this registry would include widespread advertising in the US and elsewhere covering how the works can be claimed, or registered if not yet scanned, and where. It should also be possible to try to port the LOC rightsholder database over to the new registry.

2. All non-search uses on an opt-in basis ONLY during the life of copyright. This is critical, because anything less eviscerates all of copyright. It’s a precedent we cannot allow.

3. Search results displaying a reasonable amount (half a page? A whole page?) on an opt-out basis for all book length works. This is an exact parallel to web search (which has already been tested and found to be fair use), and is critical to growing our knowledge base. To do this, Google will get the right to scan anything not excluded by the rights holder. Google can monetize this with ad display, as is currently done for web sites.

4. Opt-in only licensing to libraries. A reasonable split would pro rate the licensing fees by the length of the file covering each work, payable to all rights holders as long as the work is in copyright.

5. Opt-in only licensing of the right to sell ebook, POD and other versions of the works in the database. I liked the 65/35 split between Google and the rights-holders. It seems reasonable.

So where do those enormous sums come in?

6. Every time someone clicks on a book search link, the page should include a free ad for the book. And if the book is available through their site or a major on-line source, it should include links to those sellers. Affiliate links, perhaps, so that Google gets a commission, but links nonetheless. I suspect that this will greatly increase book sales, especially for small presses and self-published authors.

I’m sure I missed some important points. What would you like to add?

Marion’s Rules of Publishing

Friday, September 25th, 2009

This isn’t complete, and I’ll try to keep adding to them, but here are a few of my favorite rules:

1. You may get what you pay for, but you rarely get much more.
Great, cheap alternatives usually have a catch.

2. Crunch your numbers.
If you’re making a decision that can have a major impact on your results, always test the alternatives, and compare the changes in your bottom line. (If you don’t know how, read the rest of my blog, take a seminar I offer at one of the publishing conferences near you or ask a question in the comments!)

3. It depends.
You’ll hear a lot of general rules pronounced (including this list). Most of them are true for at least some circumstances. But all of them have exceptions. Look at the situation in front of you, and think it through, rather than relying upon a rule.

4. There are NO shortcuts in this business.
There are, however, a large number of very attractive routes leading to heartbreak.

4A. Those dinosaurs, the “big NYC publishers,” are run by some very smart people.
If they’re not doing something that seems simple and obvious to you, the chances are pretty good that you’re missing something.

5. Success at self-publishing is harder than getting published by a mainstream house.
(IF you define success in terms of exposure, fame or profit.)

6. I repeat: crunch your numbers!

Estimating Sales, Part IV: Using Public Databases

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

It’s important to do more than one estimate of your titles’ sales. Why? Because each set of data you use will give you a different number, and all of them will be wrong in different ways. If you average them, you get a better chance of a good prediction. Of course, if you could pick the best estimate from the bunch, you’d be closer, but which one is it? I don’t know, and you probably don’t either.

The previous 3 parts of this series dealt with the use of experience, marketing plans, and Amazon data on comparable titles to predict the sales of either that comp or of your book. Part V will discuss using sales of comps to predict sales of your title, and then combining all of the various predictions into an overall prediction of sales for your title.

This part of the series covers projecting the sales of comparable titles from other sources of data, and combining all the various projections of comparables’ sales. The best sources of data besides Amazon are Bookscan, Ingram, and perhaps the data your friends inside other publishing companies are willing to share. (That last is an old industry tradition that is fading slowly as the industry expands and changes.)

So, you have a list of carefully chosen comparable titles. They’re all from companies that are distributed in similar ways, and they all have similar marketing muscle behind them. They’re all aimed at the same audience, and are intended to fill similar needs.

Now what? Well, Ingram has the iPage facility. Use it to get a good idea of what Ingram’s volume has been for each of those comparables over the past few months or a year. Bookscan also offers good data on sales.

Ingram is, of course, the primary wholesaler to the book trade. You should know roughly what fraction of this type of book’s sales will go through them. For many trade books, it will be something like 50%, but for others, it will be much more or much less.

Bookscan records approximately 70% of the sales by general bookstores. Obviously, the publisher will be selling more to the bookstore than the store has moved out of the doors, but this is still a solid number. It may not be very helpful to you, though, if you’re doing books that don’t move through bookstores and similar retailers.

If you have those numbers for a “bookstore book,” or even for one that will sell a significant share of the total through stores, you can make a pretty good estimate of the total sales for that comparable title.

To go from the fraction that went through a channel, say Ingram, to the total sold, is simple. Divide the sales by the fraction. For example, let’s say that half of your books generally go through Ingram. And that you know your comparable title sold 1,000 copies through Ingram. Divide that 1,000 by 1/2, and you get 2,000. That’s your estimate of how many copies that comparable title sold — based upon the Ingram data.

For Bookscan, it’s only slightly more complex. You divide Bookscan’s report by .7 to arrive at the estimated bookstore sales, and then divide that result by the fraction that you expect to distribute through bookstores. That result is the Bookscan-based estimate of your comparable title’s total sales.

If you have an estimate of the sales through Amazon (from Part III), you can gross that up to an estimate of total sales for that title, by again dividing by the fraction of total sales that you expect to make through Amazon. (For trade books from a mid-sized publisher, that might be .15, for example. For niche non-fiction from a micro-publisher, that number might be as high as 75 or 80%.)

To make ANY estimate better, you can combine a number of different versions that are based upon different data sources. If you average them, you should help remove any random error. Here, you’d take all three estimates of total sales for each comp (based on Ingram, Bookscan and Amazon numbers), add them together, and divide by 3. [Yes, I know you know how to average. Just being complete.]

CAVEAT: This doesn’t always work. If Murphy is out to get you, all the errors will be in the same direction, perhaps because of some underlying and confounding variable that’s not properly understood.

My response to this issue: if my judgment says that the results don’t make sense, I either dig further to find the problem, or ignore the estimates. Do NOT, NOT EVER, ignore that little voice in your head that says something’s wrong.

Any questions out there? Come on, ‘fess up. I’m pretty sure my writing isn’t so incredibly lucid that everyone is still with me.

For that matter, does anyone have a better way?

E-book Pricing

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

We all know the basic theory for finding the right price: figure out how many your readers will buy at each price, and how much it will cost you to produce each copy at each volume, and then look for the price/volume combination that yields the greatest total margin.

We all also know that this is easier said than done for print books, even with the advent of databases like Nielsen Bookscan, but it’s practically impossible for ebooks. So far. Bookscan doesn’t measure sales for ebooks. You can’t call Ingram and get sales numbers for them, either.

And no one knows what the Amazon ranks for ebooks mean — not to mention, that those volumes for a given rank would change wildly in the future, as ebooks become more popular. So, we can’t really predict the volume for a given price.

What can we do? We can say that for certain types of books, certain price expectations are becoming common. For example, Amazon has made $9.99 the norm for a trade book currently in hardback. And the ebooks of titles currently available in mass market paperbacks tends to range between $3.99 and $6.39, with the upper end representing current and high-volume books, and the lower end representing backlist.

And yes, Virginia, there is a backlist for mmp in ebooks. Who knew that this was possible?? Of course, it wasn’t for print books, because of the economics of producing, storing, shipping and selling the physical object, but ebooks make it work.

In short, we’re going to have to fall back upon the old standard: find your books’ competitive titles, and price your book to meet that competition.

Will that offer you enough revenue to cover your costs? Or even, wonder of wonders, make a profit?? That is, indeed, the question. And what costs should you consider?

1. Royalties. Authors deserve to get an amount similar to the amount they get for the sale of a print copy, in my opinion. Not a similar rate, but a similar total. That may well mean that the rate is double or triple the royalty rate for print, given the smaller list prices. And publishers should consider setting the breakpoints so that we’re splitting the proceeds evenly with authors after our investments have been recovered.

2. Marketing: getting the message out to your readers is pretty much the same thing, whether you’re selling a print book or an ebook. Same types of people, same reasons to want the book, same selling points in the book. (Currently a smaller total pool of potential buyers, but that will change, I suspect.)

3. Plant costs (that’s publishing jargon for the fixed costs of preparing the manuscript for publication): the only one you don’t have, for the Kindle and some other types, and for now!, is compostion/text design. All of the editing still needs to be done (structural/ developmental, line, and copy-editing are all important to the quality of the final book). Cover images are still necessary. Etc, etc.

If the ebook is just an extra dab of icing on top of the cake of a book you’d do anyway, then the plant costs are almost irrelevant, but that’s obviously not going to be the case for very long.

4. Distribution: yes, you don’t need to ship the physical object, but you DO still need to pay those who own the channels through which you reach your reader. That may be Amazon or Fictionwise, or whoever, but it’s still a very large chunk of the revenue, if not most of it.

5. Cannibalization of Print Sales: whether through piracy, or because you believe that your readers would buy print if and only if they didn’t buy an ebook, it is possible that ebook sales will cut into your pbook sales. It doesn’t seem as if this happens yet for most types of titles, but it’s something that every publisher should consider.

In the end, only you can tell if the projected sales revenue will exceed the costs for a given title. And the only way to do that is to run your numbers, just as you did for a print book.

Some things never change.