<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Profitable Publisher &#187; ebooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gropenassoc.com/blog/tag/ebooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gropenassoc.com/blog</link>
	<description>Discussion, issues and answers for the independent publishing community, hosted by Marion Gropen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Do You Get From Your Publisher?</title>
		<link>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2010/07/what-do-you-get-from-your-publisher/</link>
		<comments>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2010/07/what-do-you-get-from-your-publisher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marion Gropen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing Answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gropenassoc.com/blog/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I keep hearing this question:  why bother with a publisher? After all, authors are doing a lot of the marketing, and their work is the core of the book. 

My answer: Money, distribution, time and quality.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing the question,  &#8220;Why bother with a publisher? After all, authors are doing a lot of the marketing, and their work is the core of the book.&#8221;</p>
<p>My answer: Money, distribution, time and quality.</p>
<p><strong>Money: </strong>You&#8217;re not risking your own money, and a publisher will invest a lot more than you want to risk. A trade book will usually cost more than $20,000 to launch. Yes, self-publishers can substitute time for money, and there are other ways to economize, but any commercial publishing venture takes a big old wad of cash.</p>
<p><strong>Distribution</strong>: Even a modest-sized house will have better distribution than you&#8217;ll be able to secure on your own. Yes, anyone can sell online, even through the biggest sites, like Amazon. But that leaves a lot of potential sales and readers that you&#8217;re not reaching. You can trade volume for margin,  but it&#8217;s a move that needs to be carefully examined.</p>
<p><strong>Time</strong>: Publishing well is a lot more complicated than it seems. You can certainly learn to do it. There are even books on most parts of the process, and if you read three or four overviews, one or two on design, a couple on editing, three to five books on publicity and book marketing, and a couple on the general business aspects of running a publishing company, you&#8217;ll learn a lot of the basics, but that&#8217;s eleven to fifteen books, plus time to try the techniques and practice. By the time you&#8217;ve learned to publish  at all well, you could have written another couple of manuscripts.</p>
<p><strong>Quality</strong>: Most &#8220;civilians&#8221; don&#8217;t consciously see the difference between a pedestrian cover design and a good one, let alone the difference between a pro&#8217;s text layout and an amateurish job. But these &#8220;trivial&#8221; differences do matter in the end. They can make someone decide to buy or not to buy your book, on an unconscious level. </p>
<p>All the people who decide what gets onto the bookshelves can tell the difference at a glance. These standards are the way they are because they work. </p>
<p>So, yes, Virginia, you can self-publish successfully. There are even a few people who use one of the so-called &#8220;self-publishing companies&#8221; successfully. But your chances of getting a larger readership, or of getting a decent living, from the effort are much better if you sign up with an experienced publishing team.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s a very short answer to a very complicated question. Which points did I gloss over, or even get completely backwards? If you&#8217;re still with me after that last hiatus, you must have an opinion. Let&#8217;s hear it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2010/07/what-do-you-get-from-your-publisher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Authors Copy the Digital Music Model?</title>
		<link>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2009/07/can-authors-copy-the-digital-music-model/</link>
		<comments>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2009/07/can-authors-copy-the-digital-music-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marion Gropen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing Answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gropenassoc.com/blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the music world, an enormous amount of the digital music is freeware -- legitimately given away by the rightsholders, with the hope that it will be passed on to others. Some people think that the book world should follow suit. I have some thoughts on the issue. (Surprised? I thought not!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most questions in this business, the right answer is &#8220;It depends.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, since ebooks and digital reading are still embryonic, at less than 1/2 of 1% of the total industry, I&#8217;m sure that the answer will change.</p>
<p>In the music world, an enormous amount of the digital music is freeware &#8212; legitimately given away by the rightsholders, with the hope that it will be passed on to others. Some people think that the book world should follow suit. I have some thoughts on the issue. (Surprised? I thought not!)</p>
<p>What models are there, so far? </p>
<p>1. Advertising. (This includes sponsorships, product placement and overt ads.) This hasn&#8217;t worked even for magazines and newspapers on the Web, and it&#8217;s a lot less likely to work for books. Books aren&#8217;t timely, there aren&#8217;t circulation figures that you can reliably pitch to sponsors, and so on and so forth. I&#8217;m not even going to class this as an &#8220;It depends&#8221; unless you&#8217;re selling the umpteenth installment in a successful series. </p>
<p>2. Selling ancillary products. Musicians do shows. Authors? Not so much. There are consultants who use books as expensive calling cards, and high-profile speakers who are able to follow this model, but there aren&#8217;t many of them. If you <b>are</b> among them, grand. Giving away copies of a book virally in order to add energy to another career is a great idea, but it&#8217;s not going to work for most of us.</p>
<p>3. Electronic ARCs or galleys. This really does work for most of us. The model is the same as the ARC on paper: give away some copies in order to build buzz for the rest. It could be that you&#8217;re giving away your current book, or it could be something from the deep backlist, but make sure that you help people understand the limits on the permitted sharing. That can be accomplished by DRM (as in the giveaways on the Kindle) or by actually <strong>asking</strong> recipients to limit their sharing, but it needs to be made overt in some way.</p>
<p>4. Giving up on compensation entirely. Many musicians and other artists create for the emotional rewards, knowing that they&#8217;re highly unlikely to ever make a living at it. This does work for many authors, but most of us want to make a living. And books tend to take longer to create than songs, or most other artforms. </p>
<p>So, what models did I miss? </p>
<p>If you liked this post, you may want to subscribe to the RSS feed at the bottom of the page. You&#8217;ll get all the rest delivered to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gropenassoc.com/blog/2009/07/can-authors-copy-the-digital-music-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
